| Event Name: NAAC Awareness Program | Event Date: 07.02.2022 |
| Faculty Coordinators: Dr. Krity Gulati | Event Timings:10:00-3:00 |
| Mode: Online | Number of Participants:23 |
| Guest Speakers:Dr. Rupali Taru & Manish Gunjan | Venue: Zoom Meeting |
The one-day NAAC Awareness Workshop aimed to familiarize faculty members and administrative staff with the accreditation process conducted by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). The workshop aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the NAAC framework, criteria, and the importance of accreditation in enhancing the quality and credibility of higher education institutions.
The workshop commenced with a brief introduction by the organizers, highlighting the significance of NAAC accreditation in the academic landscape. Participants were introduced to the resource persons, Dr. Rupali Taru and Mr. Manish Gunjan, who have extensive experience in academic accreditation and quality assurance.
The first session, led by Dr. Rupali Taru, focused on the fundamentals of NAAC accreditation. She provided an overview of the NAAC's vision and mission, explaining how the accreditation process is designed to ensure quality assurance in higher education institutions. Dr. Taru discussed the various criteria and key indicators that NAAC evaluates during the accreditation process, such as curricular aspects, teaching-learning, research, infrastructure, and institutional values.
The second session, conducted by Mr. Manish Gunjan, was dedicated to preparing the Self-Study Report (SSR), a critical document required for NAAC accreditation. Mr. Gunjan provided practical guidance on collecting and presenting data, articulating institutional strengths, and addressing areas of improvement. He also shared tips on ensuring the SSR reflects the institution’s commitment to quality education.
An interactive Q&A session was held after the presentations, allowing participants to seek clarification on various aspects of the NAAC process. Dr. Rupali Taru and Mr. Manish Gunjan addressed queries related to specific criteria, documentation requirements, and the overall accreditation timeline.
The workshop concluded with closing remarks by the organizers, who expressed gratitude to the resource persons for their insightful presentations and to the participants for their active engagement. The Vote of Thanks was delivered, acknowledging the efforts of everyone involved in making the workshop a success.